At 71 and Earning $108K, Is Working Past Retirement Age Worth It?
A 71-year-old still working and earning $108,000 annually questions whether continuing to work makes financial sense with $152,000 in retirement accounts.
A 71-year-old worker earning $108,000 per year is asking a question that growing numbers of older Americans face: does it make sense to keep working well past traditional retirement age? The individual holds $152,000 combined across IRA and Roth accounts, a balance that financial planners would generally consider modest relative to current income level.
The question touches on a broader tension in retirement planning — balancing the psychological and financial benefits of continued employment against the opportunity cost of not drawing down savings or claiming full Social Security benefits at an optimal time. Continued earned income can delay the need to tap retirement accounts, potentially allowing those funds more time to grow.
Read more At 80 With $400K in Home Equity, Should You Sell or Renovate? →
At the same time, working at 71 carries tradeoffs that go beyond the balance sheet. Health considerations, quality of life, and the diminishing window to enjoy retirement years are factors that purely financial calculations may not fully capture. Experts generally caution that income alone should not be the sole metric when evaluating whether to continue working into one's seventies.
The scenario also raises questions about required minimum distributions, which the IRS mandates for traditional IRA holders beginning at age 73, as well as how ongoing earned income interacts with Social Security benefits and tax obligations. For those still employed past 70½, Roth accounts offer continued flexibility since they carry no RMD requirements during the owner's lifetime.
Continue reading at MarketWatch.com
